About this Show

Anderson Cooper 360

News/Business. (2012) (CC)

NETWORK
CNN

DURATION
01:00:00

RATING

SCANNED IN
Annapolis, MD, USA

SOURCE
Comcast Cable

TUNER
Port 1234

VIDEO CODEC
mpeg2video

AUDIO CODEC
mp2

PIXEL WIDTH
720

PIXEL HEIGHT
480

TOPIC FREQUENCY

U.s. 14, Us 13, Fbi 10, Benghazi 9, Olmstead 8, Libya 7, Afghanistan 5, Mike 5, Romney 5, Gary Tuchman 4, Timothy Olmstead 4, Syria 4, United States 4, Minnesota 4, Wolf Blitzer 4, Cnn 3, Fran 3, Lifelock 3, Mr. Olmstead 3, George W. Bush 3,
Borrow a DVD
of this show
  CNN    Anderson Cooper 360    News/Business.  (2012)  (CC)  

    September 29, 2012
    4:00 - 5:00am EDT  

4:00am
girls getting educated. we provide free education to over 350 girls. i think it's like a fire that will grow. every year, my hope becomes more. i think i can see the future. breaking news you will only see right here on "360" after being the first to tell you that fbi investigators have not set foot in the ruins of the american consulate of benghazi, libya. tonight, we're the first it tell you why. the likely reason and from a top law enforcement official. four americans as you know were murdered in the assault, one american ambassador, christopher stevens, that was 2 1/2 weeks ago, 2 1/2 weeks, that saw the administration describe this first as a spontaneous outburst, even though reporting shows that officials knew within 24 hours it was not. today the director of national
4:01am
intelligence, james clapper, explained early evidence supported that theory, so that's why they told the white house and congress. clapper says throughout the investigation, his agency made it clear that the assessment was preliminary and could change. neither his statement nor our source have a time frame. law enforcement officials knew within 24 hours this was a terror attack. reporting reveals that even though the administration says the investigation is going smoothly, the fbi has hit a bump in the road. a senior law enforcement official, telling fran townsend, the fbi wanted the u.s. military to provide perimeter support in benghazi, protection in other words, but that request was not granted. fran is a former white house homeland security adviser, served in the george w. bush administration. sits on the cia external advisory panel and recently visited libya with mcandrews & forbes.
4:02am
and former fbi assistant director tom pointes who has extensive experience in investigating attacks overseas. so there was military protection to go into benghazi, why didn't they get it? >> the answer to the question is not really clear. so it's not unusual, when you want to set up a security perimeter, you may look to the host country. if the host country is unable or unwilling to provide it, we don't know what the answer to that is, you may ask if you think you need it for u.s. military support, but that's got to go through a process. it needs state department and nsc support, the u.s. military would have to make an assessment about how big a security package that would entail and lastly, and perhaps most importantly, you need host government. the libyan government in this case, support to allow u.s. military boots on the ground to provide sort of the defensive security perimeter around the benghazi compound. now, i spoke to a senior administration official who said
4:03am
they have been having regular meetings twice daily, secure video teleconferences on updates of the investigation. there has been regular deputies committee meetings hosted by dennis mcdonough, the deputy national security advisor and discussions regarding libyan support and cooperation, my law enforcement source was quite clear, it's not that the libyans haven't been cooperative. there have been discussions that the libyans were concerned that they themselves couldn't provide the sort of comprehensive security to protect the fbi team and that there were concerns on the libyan part about having a u.s. military presence on the ground. all of that said, anderson, as you point out, 18 days later after the attack, the fbi today sort of indicated to me through a senior law enforcement official they're having serious debates as to whether or not with the passage of so much time, whether it makes sense to take the risk at all even if they could have gotten the kind of support early on.
4:04am
now, what will they gain by going to benghazi and taking the security risk. they may decide not to go at all. >> so just to be clear, we're not sure at this point where the breakdown occurred in terms of who -- i mean, whether it was the libyans, whether it was -- or state department, we don't know where the breakdown occurred. >> no, that's right. anderson, it could have been something as simple as this sort of -- when the interagency discussion, the u.s. government writ large decided that if that's what you're required for your perimeter security, that indicated itself it was too dangerous and that they shouldn't be bothered, they shouldn't go at all. it's not even clear to us yet whether or not this request was put to the libyan government. >> fran, you say not only fbi investigators not gone to benghazi yet, but that some are not even in libya. >> that's right. anderson, whenever there's an international terrorism investigation, there's a protocol where fbi agents with palletized cargo and equipment predeploy in the region to get closer. in this case, that did happen. there were agents in germany where they conducted interviews
4:05am
of u.s. personnel who were coming out of libya, and there are also in another country, a third country in the region where they predeployed also to be nearby, but many of those still remain in that third country awaiting visas to get into tripoli. >> still waiting for visas? >> that's right. well, look, this is always -- i can tell you myself when i went, it's not easy to get a visa into libya. obviously, this is something that the libyan government can facilitate for the fbi, but you know, we saw yesterday the u.s. government drew down their personnel because of concern in the protests today so it may be that they've just been waiting for sort of a break in the security situation to get them in. >> tom fuentes, you have your own take on what's happening with the fbi contingent. >> right, anderson. during my five years running international operations at the bureau, i oversaw hundreds of these deployments, my staff and i, making the logistical arrangements, working on the visas, working with the host country on how many investigators would be allowed, how they would get there, what kind of equipment we could get
4:06am
in there. and we always had these type of challenges. what happened in this case, i talked to several senior executives the day after the attack on september 12th, who said looking at the videos of that compound being burnt to the ground, looking at the fact that the libyans have no control, no ability to maintain law and order in benghazi, we're probably not going to be able to get in there. we'll try, we'll deploy, we'll get in the neighborhood, we'll have equipment standing by, maybe we can have some assurance that we can get in there and be protected, but at this point, we don't think there's going to be a lot of information of value. basically, they have to conduct a risk assessment. what evidence are they likely to get after a crime scene has been completely trampled by locals, souvenir hunters, reporters, everybody, much of the material burnt and taken away, and they're weighing that with the odds of if they send a team in there, even with u.s. military protection, and all of a sudden mortars start raining down on their heads from nearby houses, now what do you do.
4:07am
do the marines attack those houses and kill innocent men, women and children that are -- you know, you suddenly have a war situation in an attempt to get evidence that may be of such limited value that it's just not worth the risk politically or investigatively. >> we don't really know what other information, if any, there may have been laying around that could have been scavenged by anybody, by libyans, friendly to the united states or not friendly to the united states. at both of these installations there could have been classified information for all we know, correct? >> well, i think almost undoubtedly there's been classified information lost. you simply can't burn out of a consulate like that in a minute's notice. you need thermite grenades to blow through the safes, you need to destroy the hard drives. when you're under fire, no one can do that. there was no safe rooms to do that. there was no oxygen in those safe rooms. there was no way to keep the temperature down. the people in that consulate did exactly what they should have done and that was get out of
4:08am
there as fast as they can, and not get killed. now, frankly, i would like to see the fbi's investigation on this simply because it's the least politicized agency in washington, and the fbi would come out and tell us exactly what happened there. number one, i would like to find out if those mortars in fact hit the annex as it's been described. also, were the assaults, the people that assaulted the consulate using 12.5 machine guns. that tells us a lot, that it truly was a military assault, that there's no amount of protection that would have protected that consulate. to go back to the military, absolutely right, it would be actually occupying that part of benghazi. you would have to send armor in if in fact you were being hit by artillery or heavy machine guns, and this is something that the white house is reluctant to do and it's of course politically impossible for the libyan
4:09am
government to let an american military occupy a part of benghazi. >> tom, in past experience, i don't know if there has been a situation like this, but where u.s. personnel had been evacuated, after an incident like this, who's responsible for locking down the facility, for trying to secure the facility? >> the libyan government. that's where the breakdown is. when we've had these situations overseas, we've had one of two situations. either we have a country that has an established law enforcement and military such as the embassy attacks in kenya and tanzania in 1998, or you have a failed state like somalia where we had blackhawk down. if you have that situation and it's a failed state or it's a war zone like iraq and afghanistan, had it been in the early 2000s, then you send in the military, send in as many troops as you need. you just take over. but when you're trying to do that in a sovereign country or a country trying to gain its independence and stand up for itself, that's an extremely difficult situation to do that in.
4:10am
>> tom, from your experience, is it possible to have a thorough investigation without setting foot at a crime scene like this? >> it's still impossible to have a very good investigation and bob is correct, it would be nice to go in there and see what kind of armament was used and where, you know, how they actually took down those buildings. but on the other hand, if they go in there and they find and they do the explosive residue and send everything back to the lab to be examined and they find they've got munitions from the united states, from nato countries, from other countries, that's going to basically tell them nothing, because, because of the insurrection that led up to the overthrow of gadhafi. you have countries from all over the world, including the u.s., sending munitions into that country, training the locals how to do it to overthrow the gadhafi government. they had on-the-job training for months and months in how to operate mortars and rpgs and assault rifles and pistols. so you had a war zone there for a long time, so you have tens of
4:11am
thousands of civilians who know how to operate that military hardware and would have the equipment to do it. and after gadhafi was overthrown, the new government came in, no one has gone to that country and taken the munitions and the weapons and the bombs and mortars out. that's all still sitting there. we'll have the same issue in syria when that ends. for all the stuff that's being sent in to help the rebels, what happens in the aftermath when you've got tons of stuff that came in from all over the world and it falls into the hands of bad guys. or terrorists. >> bob, you're concerned about that particularly even talking about that now for months. >> yeah. it's all over the middle east, there's weapons easily available, they're for sale, they're being shipped around. there's enormous amount of money going into countries like libya and these countries fragment. libya is a tribalized society. it's astounding if you look at the french intelligence reports that there's something like 100,000 to 200,000 militia men in libya but there's only 5,000 to 10,000 regular forces.
4:12am
the central government is outnumbered and to go to the central government and say do something about this is unrealistic. >> tom, very quickly. >> if i could add one more comment. the other issue is even if the libyans say we're going to provide our best troops, our best police officers to come in and provide perimeter security, you don't know what kind of background checks or who they're loyal to. you could have a situation like in afghanistan, that people that we have been working with and training and side by side turned and fire on our people. so that's the dangerous aspect here. you can only have confidence if it's u.s. force protection but bringing that much equipment and even armor as bob mentioned is not feasible. >> given that mortars were involved you would have to have a pretty huge perimeter to be able to secure both sites. tom, appreciate your expertise. fran, as well. bob baer, thanks. join us on facebook, follow me on twitter right now. let us know what you think about this situation. next, we will introduce you
4:13am
to the fine art of predebate trash talking. that's to say trash talking your own team and praising the other side. we'll tell you why that happens and why it's happening now and show you one debate moment that changed the face of tv and some that changed american history. we will also take a preview of what we can expect from this first debate coming next week. but some have had a hard time understanding my accent. so to make sure people get every word of the geico savings message i've been practicing how to talk like a true chicagoan. switching to geico could save you hundreds of dollars on car insurance... da bears. haha... you people sure do talk funny. geico®. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance.
4:14am
4:15am
4:16am
raw politics now. the first presidential debate of course coming up next wednesday. the thing is, winning a presidential debate just isn't like winning most things. think of it as like getting an "a" on a math test where they grade on a curve. suddenly that 60 you got looks
4:17am
pretty darned good. debates are like that, which is why you're now seeing each side doing everything they can to bend the curve downward. lowering expectations, trying to convince you and especially the pundits that their own guy can barely tie his shoes and the other guy can leap, debate opponents in a single bound. >> we know that governor romney's been practicing for months. i think the invasion of normandy took less preparation than he's putting into these debates. >> he's articulate, smart. he did a great job in 2008 during that campaign as a debater. he had some tough debates with hillary clinton and he performed well. >> well, that was rob portman, of course, who has been prepping governor romney. before that, senior obama campaign advisor david axelrod. each has been working as though the entire campaign depends on what happens in next week's debate. the question is will it? we will talk about that in a moment. first, one indisputable truth, debates can make history. >> i have been -- >> september 26, 1960. the first televised presidential
4:18am
debate, signaling a new era where appearances matter more than ever and gaffes, however small, are magnified. >> the goals are the same for all americans. >> john f. kennedy, a young senator from massachusetts, facing off against vice president richard nixon, who is known to be a fierce debater. but on screen, kennedy looks cool and calm, while nixon looks uncomfortable, sweating profusely under the hot studio lights. nixon flounders under the glare of television for all four debates. kennedy goes on to win the election. in 1976, president gerald ford makes this blunder in his debate with georgia governor jimmy carter. >> there is no soviet domination of eastern europe and there never will be under a ford administration. >> i'm sorry, could i just -- >> the remark becomes a central theme in carter's campaign and is blamed by many for costing ford the election. in 1980, ronald reagan is repeatedly attacked by president carter for his stance on health care.
4:19am
>> governor reagan, as a matter of fact, began his political career campaigning around this nation against medicare. >> but reagan wins fans and the election by staying cool. >> there you go again. >> four years later, president reagan again uses humor to handle attacks on his age during his debate with walter mondale. >> i want you to know that also, i will not make age an issue of this campaign. i am not going to exploit for political purposes my opponent's youth and inexperience. >> in the next election, democratic candidate michael dukakis is asked this controversial question in his debate with vice president george w. bush. >> governor, if kitty dukakis were raped and murdered, would you favor an irrevocable death penalty for the killer? >> no, i don't. i think you know i have opposed the death penalty during all of my life. >> the public sees his answer as cold and dispassionate and that very night, his poll numbers dropped.
4:20am
during the 1988 vice presidential debate, republican senator dan quayle's comparison to john f. kennedy elicits this blistering response from his opponent. >> senator, you are no jack kennedy. >> body language plays a part in the presidential debate. in 1992, george h.w. bush deliberately looks at his watch and he pays for it when the audience and voters see it as disrespectful. body language makes a difference in the debate between al gore and george w. bush as well. gore sighs over and over again and bush, the underdog, surprises by winning the debate and of course, the election. both president obama and governor romney are seasoned debaters, and experts say neither are prone to making major gaffes. but if there is one thing that history has taught us, when it comes to presidential debates, expect the unexpected. joining us now to talk about the moments and debate magic yet to come, republican consultant romney 2008 campaign advisor, alex castellanos and donna brazile.
4:21am
a lot of folks are saying these debates are do or die for romney. donna, do you agree? >> absolutely. first impression is very, very important. mitt romney had several opportunities to change the trajectory of the campaign, his selection of a running mate, paul ryan, got a small bounce. the convention speech didn't get any bounce, and now the first debate. this is like the first night on broadway. there will be more voters tuning in, they will be looking at his performance and if he comes across as somebody who is credible, who is up to the task, he might get another bounce out of it. >> aren't undecided voters the least likely to tune into the debates? gallup looked back at records and found only two examples where debates really changed the course. that was 1960 and 2000. >> they are important moments for these candidates but you're exactly right. it's so hard to change anything at this point. why. these two guys are not unpainted canvases. barack obama, his canvas is
4:22am
pretty much filled in. we know him. we have seen him for four years. as president. mitt romney has been through a long and grueling campaign. there is very little white space left on his canvas. so if they're really going to do something different that changes how they're understood, it has to be something very big. >> it's interesting, both candidates, campaigns are trying to lower expectations a lot. do you think mitt romney actually could be kind of better prepared than his campaign that's trying -- >> there's no question, he participated in 20 debates and as you know, you hosted a few of them, he was always well prepared. he understood what was at stake and i thought he was perhaps better prepared than any of the other candidates but you know, these debates can reinforce the current perception of the candidates and i think that will pretty much help president obama, but if mitt romney can create a different impression that he's somebody that's more likeable, that he understands the issues and that he's more compassionate or empathetic, it could re-align the campaign.
4:23am
i don't think by much, because president obama right now is in a very strong position. >> what do you think mitt romney needs to do? >> oh, i think mitt romney needs to talk about failure and success. mitt romney may not be the perfect candidate, but this president doesn't have much in the way of accomplishments, especially when it comes to this economy. he has to say look, barack obama, you may have succeeded as a politician but you haven't succeeded as a president. i know what it takes to succeed in life, i've done it a lot in business creating growth and jobs. let's talk about that. >> it does seem in the last couple days his campaign has been kind of trying to make him seem like a warmer guy. i mean, that photo -- >> hes loosened his tie, taken it off. he's laughed a little more. the job for mitt romney clearly is to get in the ring, get in the arena and to show that he can handle these tough issues. he hasn't been specific. he has to avoid talking about taxes, has to avoid talking about the 47%. he has to play offense. and president obama has to make sure that he doesn't play preventive defense.
4:24am
>> just being on that stage with the president, does that make mitt romney seem more presidential? >> absolutely. debates are great levellers. any time you're in the ring with the president of the united states, it tends to bring the water level up for both candidates. >> but let me just tell you, i will never forget when al gore, al gore had a lot of momentum, he went into the debate and i thought he was very well prepared. george bush was there as well, but you know, i don't know if you recall, anderson, some viewers heard al gore sigh, like he sounded like he was tired, and then of course, that debate with bill clinton and george herbert walker bush where he showed, he looked at his watch. so these are moments when people are really assessing your temperament, your body language, your demeanor. so it's a big night for both president obama as well as governor romney. >> did you hear him sigh? were you backstage like stop sighing? >> i heard it the first time. by the third time i pretended not to listen. but more importantly, once they
4:25am
put up that split screen, then you looked at he was rolling his eyes and of course, it was not a pretty moment. but we came back in the second debate. >> that's when the democrats started sighing, too, right after al gore. mitt romney has to demonstrate he's changed. there are a lot of voters in this country who are unsatisfied with barack obama. they think we could do better. they don't know that mitt romney is that change. neither of these guys has told us what the next four years could be like because of the changes they would bring. >> and that's i think another challenge that mitt romney has on wednesday night. that is to finally lay out some plans. he's been talking a lot about i have solutions, i know how to get the economy moving, but he really hasn't given us a concrete beyond the 59 points, the five points -- >> neither has our president, though. >> our president did in his convention speech outline what he would do over the next four years which i believe is very important because he'll have an opportunity on wednesday night to expand upon that.
4:26am
mitt romney once again, this is the third time he's going to have an opportunity to introduce himself, this time we'll see if he can charm us into thinking he's the one. >> i think you're a little confused. that was the wrong president. that was bill clinton who said that. >> thank you. ahead, we will investigate our shameful fact. after risking their lives on the battlefield, disabled veterans are fighting a battle they never expected for the benefits they deserve. we'll be right back.
4:27am
4:28am
a sixth grade teacher accused of separating special needs and african-american kids from white kids. what he's saying about the allegations when we continue. ang for your attention. so we invented a warning you can feel. introducing the all-new cadillac xts. available with a patented safety alert seat.
4:29am
when there's danger you might not see, you're warned by a pulse in the seat. it's technology you won't find in a mercedes e-class. the all-new cadillac xts has arrived, and it's bringing the future forward.
4:30am
keeping them honest report about veterans having to fight for disability benefits they say they are entitled to. their doctors have vouched for their injuries. they filed the required paperwork not to mention they've risked their lives for their country but now find themselves doing battle with the very agency that's supposed to take care of them, the department of veterans affairs. randi kaye investigates.
4:31am
>> reporter: mike rio can't go to the grocery store without making a list even for just one item. he can't drive without gripping the steering wheel so hard, his knuckles turn white. and he can't stand longer than 30 minutes because of severe back pain. this is mike rio's life post-afghanistan. >> i need to discover who i am again. i'm not asking for help for the rest of my life. i want to feel like i matter. >> reporter: mike's wife maggie says her husband returned from war a shell of the man he once was. gone was the fun-loving, free-spirited, laid back guy he used to be. war, she says, changed him. he still has ringing in the ears from explosions. he also suffers from vertigo, headaches, and has terrible anxiety.
4:32am
we saw it first-hand during our interview. mike was so anxious, he could hardly sit still. we met at mike rio's mother's house near phoenix, arizona, where he, his wife and daughter have been living for the last year and a half. maggie and their daughter share a bedroom and mike sleeps every night on the living room couch. what is it like for you at 51 to be sleeping on your mother's couch? >> ashamed. i feel low. i feel -- how can i support my family, let alone get them a house? >> reporter: mike doesn't have the money for a place of their own. he can't work. firefights and an ied blast in afghanistan left him with a traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder. maggie isn't working, either, so she can look after him.
4:33am
the money is running out, and they find themselves like hundreds of thousands of other veterans, fighting a battle they never expected. one they frankly can't believe. they're fighting for benefits from the department of veterans affairs. >> i thought they were there to help us. you know, i -- if it wasn't for my wife, i would be in the fetal position. i would be curled up in a ball. i couldn't do it. >> reporter: mike has been trying to get his disability claim processed for nearly two years. there has been lost paperwork, long wait times for appointments, and erroneous lab results. when mike was prescribed some medication, it was for a bladder infection he didn't have. mike first filed his claim in january 2011, right after he got back from afghanistan. in august, that same year, he learned his claim was finally in review. then in december 2011, he was told to expect a decision by the
4:34am
end of the year. that deadline came and went. keeping them honest, we asked veterans affairs assistant secretary tommy sours why veterans who risk their lives for this country are waiting months, even years, for disability. despite v.a. secretary eric shinseki's promises for a quick turnaround on claims. secretary shinseki said his goal was to have claims resolved in no more than 125 days with 98% accuracy. why hasn't that happened yet? >> well, again, this is a problem that has been decades in the making. we're transitioning from a paper-based system to an electronic system and it is a huge amount, a huge undertaking and task. >> reporter: is the current backlog of claims acceptable? >> it is unacceptable and we know that. we do. >> reporter: unacceptable, yet more than a year after mike filed his claim, he was still waiting.
4:35am
we interviewed 16 other veterans for this story. all of them told us they waited many months to get a simple disability claim resolved. in some cases, more than a year. many of them also told us they weren't helped quickly enough with serious mental health issues related to ptsd. in one case, a veteran told us he had called a v.a. suicide hotline and was told they would call him back. they never did. right now, according to the v.a., there are close to 900,000 claims pending and of those, 66% of them have been waiting longer than secretary shinseki's goal of 125 days. worse, more than 228,000 claims have been pending one year or more. on average, the v.a. says veterans wait 256 days before their claim is resolved. paul reichoff, the founder of iraq and afghanistan veterans of
4:36am
america, says troops are tired of the rhetoric. >> there's a difference between the speak you get out of the bureaucrats in washington and the reality of what you see on the ground. the guys and gals on the ground don't care about how many bureaucrats there are, how many pilot studies there are, how much money is being spent. they care if they have gotten a decision back from the v.a. >> reporter: there is a saying among veterans about the v.a., saying the v.a.'s policy is delay, deny until we die. what is your response to that? >> i would say there are many veterans out there that love their v.a. care, that absolutely love it. >> reporter: assistant secretary sours says the v.a. is on track to process one million claims this year, and that it paid out nearly $5 billion in compensation last year. adding to delays, the v.a. says many veterans are returning with severe and complex mental injuries, and sometimes file incomplete paperwork. the backlog also increased when thousands of vets were finally
4:37am
allowed to file claims for agent orange and gulf war syndrome. on june 27th this year, mike finally got word his disability claim had been processed, 18 months after he had filed. but mike was awarded only 40% disability, which works out to $659 a month. he got credit for his ptsd but even though he had been diagnosed with a mild traumatic brain injury, by a doctor at the v.a., he was denied coverage for that injury. like so many others, mike and maggie plan to appeal their disability rating, a process that could set them back another two years in getting their case resolved. >> he could have been killed. every time i spoke to him on the phone i thought this might be the last time i hear his voice. our relationship has had to take -- >> that's another dimension. yeah.
4:38am
our relationship. >> i'm married to a different man now. i love him as much as i've always loved him, but he's different. >> reporter: different in a way maggie and mike hope to make the v.a. understand. that $659 a month in disability certainly doesn't cover the price they've paid for war. randi kaye, cnn, phoenix, arizona. >> incredible, they might have to wait another year or two. coming up, disturbing accusations at a school in minnesota, where students say a teacher segregated the african-american students from the white students and called them horrible names. gary tuchman speaks to some of those students and the teacher at the center of the controversy, next. identity ande upside down. identity ande >> hi. >> hi. you know, i can save you 15% today if you open up a charge card account with us. >> you just read my mind. >> announcer: just one little piece of information and they
4:39am
can open bogus accounts, stealing your credit, your money and ruining your reputation. that's why you need lifelock to relentlessly protect what matters most... [beeping...] helping stop crooks before your identity is attacked. and now you can have the most comprehensive identity theft protection available today... lifelock ultimate. so for protection you just can't get anywhere else, get lifelock ultimate. >> i didn't know how serious identity theft was until i lost my credit and eventually i lost my home. >> announcer: credit monitoring is not enough, because it tells you after the fact, sometimes as much as 30 days later. with lifelock, as soon as our network spots a threat to your identity, you'll get a proactive risk alert, protecting you before you become a victim. >> identity theft was a huge, huge problem for me and it's gone away because of lifelock. >> announcer: while no one can stop all identity theft, if criminals do steal your information, lifelock will help fix it, with our $1 million service guarantee.
4:40am
don't wait until you become the next victim. you have so much to protect and nothing to lose when you call lifelock now to get two full months of identity theft protection risk free. that's right, 60 days risk-free. use promo code: gethelp. if you're not completely satisfied, notify lifelock and you won't pay a cent. order now and also get this shredder to keep your documents out of the wrong hands-- a $29 dollar value, free. get protected now. call the number on your screen or go to lifelock.com to try lifelock protection risk free for a full 60 days. use promo code: gethelp. plus get this document shredder free-- but only if you act right now. call the number on your screen now! jen's car wasn't handling well. so i brought it to mike at meineke. we gave her car a free road handling check. i like free. free is good. my money. my choice. my meineke.
4:41am
new chapter in the search for jimmy hoffa. police broke through concrete in michigan today. their findings ahead.
4:42am
4:43am
the families of several students in minnesota are suing the school and a former teacher who they say segregated african-american and white students in his classroom. the teacher had other incidents of questionable behavior on his record dating back several years and even though he's not in the classroom anymore, he is still collecting checks. gary tuchman investigated. >> reporter: it's the middle of the school day and this sixth grade teacher is riding a motorcycle. the reason timothy olmstead is not in school is complex and according to many, deeply disturbing. 12-year-old alicia jones was one of his students. >> he separated me from the white kids and sent me to the other side of the room where all the black kids were. >> reporter: timothy olmstead is accused by students and their families of taking black children and disabled children at the heights community school in st. paul, minnesota, and segregating them from white children. melissa dobbs was also a student in the class. what did you think when he put you and the other black children in the back of the room, what
4:44am
did it make you think about yourself? >> like i wasn't smart enough, or i'm not good enough -- i'm not good enough for me to be with the other children, the other white children. >> reporter: the children say at first they were afraid to tell their parents and grandparents, but they ultimately did, after they say they were repeatedly called stupid, sloppy and disgusting. why do you think he was so mean to you? >> because we was black and he was white. >> reporter: it's not just students and relatives who are speaking out about olmstead. do you work at the same school where timothy olmstead worked? >> i do. >> reporter: jennifer couture is a teacher who substituted for the class one day when olmstead was out. she worries school administrators might punish her for speaking to us about him but backs up what these children told us. when you took over his class, were the black students segregated from the rest of the class? >> yes. as were the special ed students. >> reporter: so special ed students and the black students
4:45am
were not sitting with the white students? >> no. >> reporter: the children, the parents and other teachers say the bizarre abusive behavior lasted for months. finally after continuing complaints, olmstead was placed on leave this past january and then two months later, he resigned. but get this. he's still getting paid. the st. paul school district says he's owed back sick pay. all this has caused a great deal of anger. the three children we talked with and their relatives have filed a civil suit against olmstead and the st. paul public schools, who they say knew about his actions for months and did nothing. the superintendent of schools denied to us in a written statement that the district ignored the complaints. we promptly investigated. we responded appropriately and we intend to vigorously defend the lawsuit. but the lawyer representing the children and parents disagrees. saying the school put protecting its reputation above protecting its children. >> they would rather sweep it under the rug and deal with it. that's exactly what happened in this case. >> reporter: then there is this.
4:46am
documents from the school district indicate olmstead was reprimanded back in 2011 for sexually offensive behavior toward a female co-worker at a holiday party and in 2003, he was suspended for five workdays for making sexually offensive and inappropriate references to school children. in the disciplinary letter to olmstead, the former superintendent stated for no discernible appropriate instructional reason, you digressed to describe some of your experiences of life on a farm and gave the class a graphic description of castrating horses and throwing their testicles into the field for cats to eat. despite the fact that allegations against olmstead in the past were excessively disturbing, the st. paul school district continued to welcome children into his class year after year without ever telling parents a thing. so we wanted to see what olmstead, who still has a teaching certificate, had to say. he happened to be talking to a cop when we came up to him. mr. olmstead? my name is gary tuchman with cnn.
4:47am
i want to ask you about what happened in your classroom. do you have any comments about that? >> i have no comments. >> reporter: there are allegations you separated the black children from the rest of the children in the classroom. >> no comment. >> reporter: in 2003 and 2011 reports about you, a fellow employee, saying inappropriate things to other students. >> no comment. >> reporter: did you do it or not? just be honest with me. >> no comment. >> reporter: why you still collecting a salary from the school? >> no comment. >> reporter: should taxpayers be paying you money after you resigned from school? >> no comment. >> reporter: how come you don't want to talk, sir? with all due respect. >> i won't even comment to that. >> reporter: following olmstead's litany of no comments, we asked for a comment from his attorney. in a written statement, his lawyer declared timothy olmstead has never discriminated against any student. plaintiffs' allegations against mr. olmstead are false and mr. olmstead is confident he will be completely vindicated by the true facts. what those true facts might be remain a mystery. to the children, though, what happened is all quite obvious. did he make you feel like you were not as important as the
4:48am
white kids in the class? children who are still dealing with the emotional ramifications. gary tuchman, cnn, st. paul, minnesota. >> we will certainly continue to follow that story. as the battle rages on, the latest on what's happening to syria's chemical weapons. that report next.
4:49am
4:50am
4:51am
>> quick programming note. we ran out of time for our report on the social issues that americans tell us will be number one for them this election. health care, we're putting it up
4:52am
in full on our website. right now let's join susan hendrix with the bulletin. opposition forces say 144 people were killed today across syria. 50 in the city of aleppo alone where a fierce battle is raging between government and opposition forces. meanwhile, u.s. defense secretary leon panetta says the u.s. has intelligence that syria's government has moved some of its chemical weapons to secure them. newly released documents show that colorado movie theater shooting suspect james holmes threatened someone at the university of colorado where he was a graduate student, and had been banned from campus. the documents are heavily redacted but prosecutors say it was a professor that holmes threatened. michigan authorities took two soil samples from beneath a storage shed at a suburban detroit home in the latest search for former teamster chief jimmy hoffa. he has been missing since 1975. he was declared dead in 1982. a tipster told police he saw a
4:53am
body being buried at the site the day after hoffa disappeared. the soil samples will be tested for human remains. police say today's search did not turn up any evidence that someone was buried there. a rare white whale has been spotted off australia's eastern coast. the albino humpback has been nicknamed by researchers who track his location. he is the only documented all white adult hump become whale. coming up, undeniable proof that wolf blitzer is hipper than the rest of us.
4:54am
4:55am
4:56am
4:57am
no one and i mean no one is hipper than wolf blitzer. yesterday in "the situation room" he proved it once and for all after a certain news item involving the music business. take a look. >> elvis presley is no longer the artist with the most billboard hot 100 hits. that title now goes to rapper lil' wayne. lil' wayne -- >> you keep saying little. it's lil' wayne. >> i'm not all that hip. not as hip as you. >> it's lil' wayne. >> okay. thanks. >> not little. not little. >> how do you say it? >> l-i-l. >> wolf blitzer, rap expert. this is actually the latest in a long type of hipster moves by sir blitz-a-lot. need i remind you he danced on stage at the "soul train" awards.
4:58am
lest you think that was an anomaly, check out b. diddy keeping it real on "ellen." ♪ >> shorty got low indeed. you see, he had a long history of being hip. he does. i think he bumped it up a notch recently with the new glasses although as i said on the "ridiculist" a couple weeks ago when he debuted the new look, i think maybe gray-z was taking a page from the nothing's cooler than ac playbook. there's just, i don't know, let me put my glasses on. there's just something -- oh, you know what? i think i know what it is. it would seem that mr. wolf blitzer got himself some new glasses. i wonder where he could have possibly gotten that idea. now, i don't want to accuse wolf blitzer of going all single white female on me but these
4:59am
glasses, they're kind of my thing. so last week, snoop wolf filled in for me here on "360" and guest hosted the "ridiculist" and i think he made some fair points. >> when two undeniably hunk-tastic men work together, a rivalry is inevitably going to arise. >> i ask you, is there anything better than hearing wolf blitzer say the word hunk-tastic on friday night? the answer is yes, there is something much, much better. pour yourself a cocktail, dim the lights, sit back and behold. >> the pussy willows blowing in the wind on the lake of shore titekaka are almost as magical as uranus. >> what? i leave for one night and you have this poor man doing this? the guy used to be a white house correspondent, for goodness sakes. i would explain the context of that but frankly, i have no idea what the context was. i actually prefer for it to co

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)